Cotton and the Jute Economy

Reference library · 1039 words

Two fibres built modern Indian industry, and they did so in almost opposite ways. Cotton grew on the black soils of the Deccan and Gujarat, was spun in mills owned largely by Indian merchant families in Bombay and Ahmedabad, and became the base of a domestic manufacturing class that would later fund political movements. Jute grew in the deltaic districts of Bengal, was processed in mills strung along the Hooghly river that were owned overwhelmingly by British managing agencies, and became a classic colonial export commodity. Understanding the difference between these two histories explains a great deal about why Indian industrialisation developed the shape it did.

Cotton has been spun and woven in the subcontinent for millennia, and Indian printed and woven cottons were a major item of world trade long before mechanisation. That earlier trade collapsed in the nineteenth century as British mills, protected by tariffs at home and supplied with raw Indian cotton, undercut Indian handloom production. Mechanised spinning arrived in India in 1854, when the Bombay Spinning and Weaving Company began operating, established by the Parsi merchant Cowasjee Nanabhoy Davar. Bombay was a logical location: it had a port, a cotton growing hinterland reachable by rail, and a merchant community with capital accumulated from the China trade. Ahmedabad followed and eventually rivalled it, earning the nickname the Manchester of the East.

The industry received an extraordinary and temporary boost during the American Civil War. Between 1861 and 1865 the Union blockade cut Southern cotton exports to Lancashire, prices for Indian raw cotton rose steeply, and Bombay experienced a speculative boom that funded land reclamation, banks and new mills. The collapse when American supply resumed after 1865 ruined many speculators, but the mills and the infrastructure remained. By the interwar period Indian mills supplied a large share of the domestic cloth market, and the industry had become politically significant. Gandhi organised Ahmedabad mill workers in 1918 and the Textile Labour Association, known as the Majoor Mahajan Sangh, was formed in 1920. The swadeshi campaign for Indian made goods, and the spinning wheel that Gandhi placed at the centre of the nationalist movement, gave cotton a symbolic weight that no other commodity carried.

Jute, the Hooghly and the wound of Partition

Jute is a bast fibre, stripped from the stems of plants grown in warm, humid, flood prone land, and the Ganges and Brahmaputra delta suited it almost perfectly. It is retted, meaning soaked in water until the fibre separates, then dried and baled. Spun and woven, it makes sacking, hessian, rope and backing cloth, and in the nineteenth century it became the universal packaging material of world trade, carrying grain, sugar, coffee, cement and fertiliser. Dundee in Scotland pioneered mechanised jute processing, having discovered that the brittle fibre could be softened with whale oil. In 1855 George Acland set up a mill at Rishra on the Hooghly north of Calcutta, and the industry migrated to the source of its raw material. By the early twentieth century the Hooghly mills dominated world jute manufacturing, and the trade was controlled by British managing agency houses with limited Indian ownership.

Partition in 1947 cut the industry in half along a line that had no economic logic. The great majority of the jute growing districts fell in East Bengal, which became East Pakistan and later Bangladesh, while almost all the mills stood in West Bengal around Calcutta. Both new states responded predictably: India pushed hard to expand jute cultivation in West Bengal, Assam and Bihar, and Pakistan built mills at Narayanganj and elsewhere to process its own crop. Neither side has ever quite recovered the integration that existed before, and the Hooghly mill belt entered a long period of underinvestment, labour conflict and intermittent closure that continues to generate disputes today.

The larger threat to jute was chemical. Polypropylene woven sacks, cheaper and lighter and immune to rot, displaced hessian across most of world packaging from the 1960s onward. India responded with legislation rather than the market: the Jute Packaging Materials (Compulsory Use in Packing Commodities) Act of 1987 requires that specified commodities, notably foodgrains and sugar, be packed in jute bags, with the reservation percentages reviewed periodically by the government. The Jute Corporation of India, established in 1971, buys raw jute at a minimum support price to protect growers. The result is an industry sustained substantially by public procurement, which supporters defend as protection for several million farming households and mill workers, and critics describe as a subsidy that has delayed necessary adjustment. Both descriptions are defensible.

Cotton after liberalisation

Cotton's trajectory since independence has been very different. Indian cotton yields were historically low, and the crop was notorious for consuming a large share of the country's agricultural pesticide. Insect resistant Bt cotton, engineered to express a bacterial protein toxic to bollworms, was approved for commercial cultivation in India in 2002 after considerable controversy, and adoption by farmers was rapid and near total within a decade. Production rose substantially, and India became one of the world's largest cotton producers alongside China and the United States. The gains have been genuinely disputed: some studies attribute yield growth chiefly to the technology, others emphasise irrigation, hybrid seed and fertiliser, and the resurgence of pink bollworm resistance in parts of Gujarat and Maharashtra has complicated the picture further. Farmer distress in rainfed cotton districts of Vidarbha and Telangana remains a serious and recurring problem.

Downstream, the textile industry is now one of India's largest employers after agriculture, spread across spinning mills in Coimbatore and Tiruppur in Tamil Nadu, garment clusters in Bengaluru, Ludhiana and the National Capital Region, and a very large decentralised powerloom and handloom sector. The sector's competitiveness has been constrained by fragmentation, since much production sits in small units that struggle to meet the scale and compliance demands of global buyers, and by the historic use of size based incentives that discouraged firms from growing. India exports large volumes of cotton yarn while importing significant quantities of finished fabric, a pattern that policy has tried, with mixed success, to reverse. The two fibres thus end in a curious symmetry: jute survives largely because the state requires its use, and cotton grew largely because the state got out of the way.

Back to the library