Vocational Training and India's Skilled Trades

Reference library · 1030 words

India adds more people to working age each year than any other country. That arithmetic is usually described as a demographic dividend, but a dividend is only paid if the workers have skills someone will pay for. India's difficulty is not a shortage of young people or even a shortage of graduates. It is that the country produces large numbers of degree holders with weak employability and comparatively few certified tradespeople, while employers in construction, manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and hospitality report chronic difficulty finding welders, fitters, electricians, machinists, nursing assistants and heavy vehicle drivers who can work to standard from day one.

The machinery that exists

The formal system is older than most people assume. Industrial Training Institutes, universally called ITIs, were established under the Craftsmen Training Scheme launched in 1950, and there are now several thousand of them across the country, a minority run by state governments and the majority privately run under affiliation. They deliver one and two year courses in designated trades leading to the National Trade Certificate. Alongside them sits the Apprentices Act of 1961, which created a legal framework for employer based apprenticeship, and which was substantially amended in 2014 to reduce the penal provisions that had discouraged firms from participating and to widen the range of trades and establishments covered.

Since 2014 the sector has been reorganised under a dedicated Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship. Its main instruments are the National Skill Development Corporation, a public private body that funds and supports training providers, the National Council for Vocational Education and Training, which sets standards and accredits assessors, and the flagship Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana, a scheme that has funded short duration training and, importantly, recognition of prior learning, whereby workers who already do a job competently can be assessed and certified without repeating instruction. A national skill qualification framework maps qualifications to levels, in the manner of the European and Australian frameworks, so that a certificate can in principle be compared across sectors and countries.

Why the system underperforms

Several problems recur in evaluations by the Comptroller and Auditor General, by parliamentary standing committees and by independent researchers. The first is placement. Short duration courses of a few hundred hours can certify a large number of people cheaply, which suits schemes measured by throughput, but a short course rarely produces a tradesperson an employer will trust with expensive equipment. Reported placement rates for short duration training have often been disappointing, and where placement occurs it is frequently into low wage work unrelated to the certified trade.

The second is equipment and instructor quality. A welding course is only as good as the welding bay. Many institutes, particularly smaller private ones, teach on machinery that predates the technology their graduates will meet on site, and instructor posts go unfilled or are filled by people who have not themselves worked in industry. Employers who might otherwise recruit directly from institutes therefore retrain from scratch, which reinforces their view that the certificate means little, which in turn reduces the wage premium and discourages students from enrolling. That loop is the central mechanism of the problem.

The third is social. Vocational training in India carries a status penalty that is unusually strong even by international standards. Manual trades are entangled with caste hierarchies in which handwork has historically been the marker of low ritual status, and a family that has climbed far enough to consider post secondary education generally wants a degree, however weak, rather than a trade certificate, however useful. Parents are not being irrational: for a long period the returns to a generic degree in terms of marriage prospects and government job eligibility exceeded the returns to a trade. Changing that calculation requires wages to move, not slogans.

The fourth is the informal economy. The great majority of Indian employment is informal, in enterprises too small to register, and informal firms do not hire on certificates. They hire on kinship, on referral, and on the traditional ustad and shagird relationship in which a young person learns from a master over years without any document at the end. That system transmits real skill. It also traps workers, because uncertified competence cannot be carried to another employer, another state or another country.

Skills, migration and the outward market

This last point is what connects vocational training to the Indian diaspora. Certification is a passport. Gulf employers recruiting for construction and services, Japanese employers under the specified skilled worker arrangements, German employers under labour agreements aimed at nursing and technical trades, and Australian and Canadian employers operating through points based migration systems all require documented, assessed skills. India has signed migration and mobility partnership arrangements with several European countries and has worked on skill certification aligned to destination country requirements, including pre departure orientation training for workers heading to the Gulf.

The gap between an Indian trade certificate and a destination country licence is where most of the friction lies. An electrician certified in Uttar Pradesh cannot simply wire houses in Melbourne or Toronto; they face a licensing regime with its own examinations, safety codes and supervised hours. Skills recognition agreements attempt to shrink that gap, but progress is slow because licensing authorities are typically state or provincial bodies with no obligation to accommodate foreign qualifications and with a genuine public safety interest in caution. Nursing is the partial exception, because international standards are better developed and shortages are acute enough to force accommodation.

Where the picture is more encouraging is in specific industrial corridors. Automotive manufacturing around Chennai, Pune and Gurugram, electronics assembly expanding under production linked incentive schemes, and the rapid growth of warehousing and cold chain logistics have created employers large enough to run their own structured training, sometimes in partnership with institutes, and disciplined enough to pay for skill. Dual system pilots, modelled loosely on German practice and combining classroom instruction with substantial workplace time, have shown better results than classroom only short courses. The consistent lesson from these pockets is unglamorous: training works when a specific employer with a specific vacancy is involved in designing and delivering it, and mostly does not work when it is procured centrally by the batch.

Back to the library